Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:WSJ: Barclays and Rydex Currency Products Are Not the Same Not Rated 2.7 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Tuesday, May 15, 2007

WSJ: Barclays and Rydex Currency Products Are Not the Same

by: Sean Hanna, Editor in Chief

Rydex is no longer alone in arming fund traders playing the currency speculation game. The WSJ's Fund Track column picks up on Barclays Bank and its new iPath exchange currency notes (ECNs). The notes take aim directly at the niche carved out by Rydex in last year. Since Rydex debuted its CurrencyShares ETFs in December 2005, they have taken in more than $1 billion of assets in eight products.

A billion is small potatos for Barclays Bank, though, as the London-based bank is already the marketshare leader with its iShares family of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The three new Barclays products -- iPath EUR/USD Exchange Rate ETN, iPath GBP/USD Exchange Rate ETN and iPath JPY/USD Exchange Rate ETN -- all trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

Both of the products offer investors the local yield of the currency they invest in along with changes in the currency's value.

There is more than a semantic difference (ETFs versus ETNs) between the Rydex and Barclays products. As the paper points out, investors are adopting different types of risk when they buy the two products. In the Rydex case, they are purchasing a share of the portfolio. That means they retain any risk that the Rydex ETF fails to track total return of the underlying currency. This risk is currently negligible as the portfolio invests entirely in the underlying currency, says Tim Meyers, ETF business manager at Rydex.

"Any price movement is based on the price movement of the underlying currencies. The return also includes interest from the demand deposit account, which is held at JP Morgan," explained Meyers. The ETFs' total return is net of fees charged by Rydex.

Meanwhile, Barclays is backing the performance of ETNs, that means that the investor is taking on the credit risk associated with Barclays implicit guaranty.

In the case of the Yen products, Barclays also has an edge since it collects interest based on U.S. short term rates from which it collects its fees. The Rydex Yen fund, on the other hand, collects the short term rate in Japan which is now close to zero [it is currently roughly 27 basis points]. That means that the fund sees a drag from its management fee whereas the Barclays ECN does not.

There are also tax differences between ECNs and ETFs: The Rydex ETFs pass along monthly interest income that are taxed as ordinary income while Barclays ETNs are gains are taxed only when they are sold (or when the maturities mature in 30 years).

For Rydex, Barclays launch of the new ETNs comes at a sensitive time. The CurrencyShares are Rydex's quickest growing product, say industry sources. Whether they will continue to maintain their growth in the face of the new competition remains to be seen, but insiders must be watching the developments at Barclays with special interest as Rydex's owner, a trust controlled by the family of deceased founder Skip Viragh, is in active negotiations to sell the firm.

Still, as with any launch in the SEC-entangled ETF world, Barclays product is no surprise. The news will be in how it is received by investors. 

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that the CurrencyShares carry a tracking error risk. As the ETFs are not based on an index, they have no tracking error.

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

2.7
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2025: Q1
2024: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly


  1. MFDF webinar - 2024 Fair Valuation Pricing Survey: Building and Strengthening the Valuation Operating Model, January 7
  2. WE - Trailblazing Leaderships: Insights From Los Angeles' Leading Women CEOs, January 8
  3. MFDF webinar - 15(c) White Paper Webinar Series: Part 2 – Board Processes, January 9
  4. MFDF webinar - AI and Fund Compliance, January 21
  5. MFDF In Focus - In Focus: Small Boards' Use of Skills Matrices, January 22
  6. FSI OneVoice 2025, Jan 27-29
  7. MFDF 2025 Directors' Institute, Jan 27-29
  8. Nicsa webinar - An Intro to Irish and Luxembourg Investment Platforms for US Asset Managers, January 29
  9. 2025 ICI Innovate, Feb 3-5
  10. Nicsa webinar - AI In Operations: Boosting Productivity for Wealth & Asset Management Firms, February 5
  11. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, February 10
  12. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, February 11
  13. Expect Miracles In Manhattan 2025, February 27
  14. Citywire Scottsdale CIO Summit 2025, Feb 27-28
  15. T3 Technology Conference 2025, Mar 3-6
  16. Nicsa 2025 Strategic Leadership Forum, Mar 5-7
  17. MFDF 2025 Fund Governance & Regulatory Insights Conference, Mar 6-7
  18. Citywire Pro Buyer New York Due Diligence Retreat 2025, Mar 6-7
  19. 2025 MMI Summit, Mar 27-28
  20. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, April 2
  21. Envestnet Elevate 2025, Apr 9-10
  22. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, April 15
  23. The 36th Sub-Advised Funds Forum, Apr 29-30
  24. Expect Miracles 6th Annual Distance Challenge, May 13-20
  25. Morningstar Investment Conference 2025, Jun 25-26
  26. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, July 9




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2025
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use