Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Were Funds in Cahoots With Brokers? Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, October 23, 2003

Were Funds in Cahoots With Brokers?

by: Nicole Halsey

The mutual fund industry’s bad day just got worse. The SEC is probing whether some mutual fund companies made deals to send trades to particular brokers if these brokers in turn promoted their funds to clients. Basically, the more trades a fund company sent a broker’s way, the more that broker would favor and tout that fund’s products. The SEC began its investigation several months ago, but now it seems as though the rooster’s come home to roost.

Sources told the Wall Street Journal that 15 brokers are suspected of engaging in these practices, however it isn’t clear how many will be included in the SEC’s probe.

If charged, the brokerages involved could face enforcement actions and fines for failing to disclose the arrangements to investors. They could also be in violation of NASD rules that forbid them from recommending funds on the basis of commissions.

At the same time, the funds involved could face SEC action for violating rules that dictate how they are supposed to determine where to spend trading-commission money. Commissions come out of fund assets, making them investors’ money and managers are mandated to get the best execution (read: most cost efficient) for their buck.

The fallout has already affected some Wall Street firms. Morgan Stanley is in hot water again after the company announced in a government filing that the SEC is considering bringing charges against it because of its relationship with several brokerages.

In last week’s filing, Morgan Stanley made note of a relationship its brokers had with 14 fund companies whose funds would be favored in addition to in-house funds when their brokers made recommendations to clients.

Deals like this one can fall into two categories: revenue sharing, in which funds help pay a broker’s marketing expenses or soft-dollar deals in which funds pay direct trading commissions to cover research by brokers. Not everyone agrees with these practices but they are legal by regulatory standards.

But, promoting a fund because of the amount a broker will receive in commission isn’t.

In the meantime, until formal charges are made, the SEC is considering pushing through new rules requiring that brokers disclose how they are paid.  

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use