Fundsters worried about the implications of the new Dodd-Frank financial reform law may want to keep an eye on
Janus [see profile]. Last month, under the new law, Janus' shareholders voted (82.7 million shares to 59.9 million shares) to reject the pay package for CEO
Dick Weil and four other top execs. The move comes as Janus continues to suffer net outflows and before
P&I claimed Weil $20.3 million pay package put him second place in pay among CEOs at publicly traded money managers [
see The MFWire, 5/16/2011]. ($10 million of that was a signing bonus of restricted stock that takes three years to vest [
see filing].)
| Dick Weil Janus Capital Group CEO | |
P&I and
Reuters both reported on Janus' recent woes, noting the irony of the non-binding Janus "say-on-pay" vote, given that Janus is one of the most aggressive supporters of such resolutions when voted on for its funds' portfolio companies.
"We know that we haven't yet delivered the results that we need to deliver," Weil told P&I.
A number of insiders weighed in for the Reuters piece, including:
Michael Cuggino, president and PM for
Permanent Portfolio Funds;
Lisa Lindsley of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees labor union;
Jeff Marshall, co-founder of
Moxyvote.com; and
John Miller, PM at
Ariel Investments (a big Janus shareholder). P&I, meanwhile, spoke to Weil himself, as well as:
Michael Kim, analyst at
Sandler O'Neill & Partners; Miller of Ariel; and
Greg Warren, senior analyst at
Morningstar. 
Edited by:
Neil Anderson, Managing Editor
Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE